1. Health of 5-year-old children after assisted reproduction
   
2. Results of ICSI in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia
   
3. Uterine peristaltic activity and the development of endometriosis
   

Obstetrics

4. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.
   

1. Health of 5-year-old children after assisted reproduction

Over a million children have been born from assisted conception worldwide. Newer techniques being introduced appear less and less 'natural', such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), but there is little information on these children beyond the neonatal period. 540 ICSI conceived 5-year-old children from five European countries were comprehensively assessed, along with 538 matched naturally conceived children and 437 children conceived with standard IVF. Of the 540 ICSI children examined, 63 (4.2%) had experienced a major congenital malformation. Compared with naturally conceived children, the odds of a major malformation were 2.77 (95% CI 1.41-5.46) for ICSI children and 1.80 (95% CI 0.85-3.81) for IVF children; these estimates were little affected by adjustment for socio-demographic factors. The higher rate observed in the ICSI group was due partially to an excess of malformations in the (boys') urogenital system. In addition, ICSI and IVF children were more likely than naturally conceived children to have had a significant childhood illness, to have had a surgical operation, to require medical therapy and to be admitted to hospital. A detailed physical examination revealed no further substantial differences between the groups, however. It is concluded that singleton ICSI and IVF 5-year-olds are more likely to need health care resources than naturally conceived children. Assessment of singleton ICSI and IVF children at 5 years of age was generally reassuring, however, we found that ICSI children presented with more major congenital malformations and both ICSI and IVF children were more likely to need health care resources than naturally conceived children. Ongoing monitoring of these children is therefore required.

Reference

Bonduelle M, Wennerholm UB, Loft A, Tarlatzis BC, Peters C, Henriet S, Mau C, Victorin-Cederquist A, Van Steirteghem A, Balaska A, Emberson JR, Sutcliffe AG. A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception. Hum Reprod. 2005 Feb;20(2):413-9. Epub 2004 Dec 2.

TOP

2. Results of ICSI in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia

The purpose of this study was to assess cumulative delivery rates in patients with non-obstructive or obstructive azoospermia following treatment by testicular sperm extraction (TESE)-ICSI. A cohort follow-up study was conducted. Between January 1994 and December 2000, 364 couples with obstructive azoospermia underwent a total of 609 fresh TESE-ICSI treatment cycles. In addition, 303 fresh TESE-ICSI treatment cycles were performed in 235 couples for non-obstructive azoospermia. This study included only patients in whom sperm was recovered. In the non-obstructive group, only patients with maturation arrest, atrophic sclerosis and germ cell aplasia were included. The main outcome measure was a delivery beyond 25 weeks gestation. In patients with obstructive azoospermia, the crude delivery rate after three cycles was 35% while the expected cumulative delivery rate was 48% [95% confidence interval (CI), 41-55]. On the other hand, in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, the crude cumulative delivery rate after three treatment cycles was 17% while the expected delivery rate was 31% (95% CI, 15-46). A high dropout rate in couples with both non-obstructive and obstructive azoospermia was observed (75 and 50% respectively, after the first cycle). This study shows that there is a value in performing several TESE-ICSI attempts in patients with obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. The estimates of the non-obstructive group beginning from the third cycle are less reliable due to fewer patients. However, overall, the obstructive group performed better than the non-obstructive group.

Reference

Osmanagaoglu K, Vernaeve V, Kolibianakis E, Tournaye H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. Cumulative delivery rates after ICSI treatment cycles with freshly retrieved testicular sperm: a 7-year follow-up study. Hum Reprod. 2003 Sep;18(9):1836-40.

TOP

3. Uterine peristaltic activity and the development of endometriosis.

Peristaltic activity of the nonpregnant uterus serves fundamental functions in the early process of reproduction, such as directed transport of spermatozoa into the tube ipsilateral to the dominant follicle, high fundal implantation of the embryo, and, possibly, retrograde menstruation. Hyperperistalsis of the uterus is significantly associated with the development of endometriosis and adenomyosis. In women with hyperperistalsis, fragments of basal endometrium are detached during menstruation and transported into the peritoneal cavity. Fragments of basal endometrium have, because of their equipment with estrogen and progesterone receptors and because of their ability to produce estrogen, an increased potential of implantation and proliferation, resulting in pelvic endometriosis. In addition, hyperperistalsis induces the proliferation of basal endometrium into myometrial dehiscencies. This results in endometriosis-associated adenomyosis with a prevalence of approximately 90%. Adenomyosis results in impaired directed sperm transport and thus constitutes an important cause of sterility in women with endometriosis. Our own date and that from the literature strongly suggest that the principal mechanism of endometriosis/adenomyosis is the paracrine interference of endometrial estrogen with the cyclical endocrine control of archimyometrial peristalsis exerted by the ovary, thus resulting in hyperperistalsis.

Reference

Leyendecker G, Kunz G, Herbertz M, Beil D, Huppert P, Mall G, Kissler S, Noe M, Wildt L. Uterine peristaltic activity and the development of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Dec;1034:338-55.

TOP

4. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.

The proportion of women who attempt vaginal delivery after prior cesarean delivery has decreased largely because of concern about safety. The absolute and relative risks associated with a trial of labor in women with a history of cesarean delivery, as compared with elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor, are uncertain. A prospective four-year observational study was conducted of all women with a singleton gestation and a prior cesarean delivery at 19 academic medical centers. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between women who underwent a trial of labor and women who had an elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor. Vaginal delivery was attempted by 17,898 women, and 15,801 women underwent elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor. Symptomatic uterine rupture occurred in 124 women who underwent a trial of labor (0.7 percent). Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy occurred in no infants whose mothers underwent elective repeated cesarean delivery and in 12 infants born at term whose mothers underwent a trial of labor (P<0.001). Seven of these cases of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy followed uterine rupture (absolute risk, 0.46 per 1000 women at term undergoing a trial of labor), including two neonatal deaths. The rate of endometritis was higher in women undergoing a trial of labor than in women undergoing repeated elective cesarean delivery (2.9 percent vs. 1.8 percent), as was the rate of blood transfusion (1.7 percent vs. 1.0 percent). The frequency of hysterectomy and of maternal death did not differ significantly between groups (0.2 percent vs. 0.3 percent, and 0.02 percent vs. 0.04 percent, respectively). It is concluded that a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery is associated with a greater perinatal risk than is elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor, although absolute risks are low. This information is relevant for counseling women about their choices after a cesarean section.

Reference

Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai B, Langer O, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, Gabbe SG; Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 16;351(25):2581-9. Epub 2004 Dec 14.

TOP